I've known about her work for a while, and I've respected her for a while, but only recently have I really delved into her. I've been reading interviews, and I recently watched her Art 21, and a documentary about her MoMA retrospective. Watching the documentary made me wish at first that I'd seen the show--to have stood, surrounded by her works, reproduced or projected, would have been incredible, and to sit across from her and share that moment would have been an irreplaceable experience in my life. Unfortunately, I didn't become aware of the show until after it had become somewhat of a circus--a strange competition to get the chance to sit with her, which was not something I was particularly interested in at the time.
But I'm rapidly realizing that I have so much to learn from her. In her Art 21, she shares an anecdote about a time in her youth when she tried to convince her father's military colleagues to use their airplanes to help her make drawings in the sky. They refused.
So:
"Very early, I understood there
are certain things I can't do. But at the same time, I had a revelation
that, actually, I can use anything I want--I can use the water, the
islands, the earth, the fire, the air, and myself. And this was the
moment that I decided it's completely ridiculous to go to the studio and
make something two-dimensional, when I could have the entire world
there for me. And that's when I stopped painting."
I've
been thinking a lot about the idea of the world as a studio, so hearing
her say this was incredibly inspiring and validating for me. That, and her sense of humor about mortality: "You can't decide when you're going to die, but you definitely can rehearse your funeral."
Her commitment to the future
development of performance art is also extremely significant. She is committed to teaching just as
much as she is committed to her own practice. Here are some more quotes
from her Art 21:
"When you die, you can't take your physical goods with you, but the
good idea can stay. I am very occupied now by my legacy. It's very
important for me, the preservation of performance art, and ow it got to
develop, and what is the future of performance art."
"Ive been thinking so much, 'What is the role of an artist? What
is my function on this earth anyway?' I think that being an artist is
such a huge responsibility. In my case, I create three groups of what I
call 'Artitudes'--what I have to do as an artist. I call the first
group Artist Body, and it's just very simple--it's me performing in
front of the audience. Second is the Public Body--to create objects (I
call them transitory because they're not sculptures) and circumstances
in which the public can actually perform for themselves and get
experience. And the third would be Student Body, and this is my
function as a teacher--that actually, when you come to one point of your
life, that you really have to unconditionally transfer the knowledge to
a younger generation of artists. And not only transfer it, but also
help them in the development. It's really, in a way, a kind of fair dialogue, because they give you a sense of the time you live in (because they're young, and they understand the world differently), and you give them the experience"
This level of care that she has for the the development of the medium
as a whole is apparent in the way she teaches--for the retrospective,
she trained young artists to re-perform her most historically
significant works. For this process, she brought the group of artists
to her house for an extended workshop, during which she tested their
limits (she had them practice fasting, existing in silence, entering a
lake naked--all exercises to practice being present). The artists spoke
about how much they had to trust her in order to willingly participate
in something like this, and how transformative the experience was.
Before the opening of the show, Marina spoke with all of them about how
much she was trusting them now--that her life was essentially in their
hands. She was passing her ideas, critical moments of her life, on to
the next generation of artists, removing her own ego from the
experience, so that each situation could survive for a new audience.
Also, I was impressed by the fact that there are photos from every
moment of her life--every incarnation of every performance; personal
moments with Ulay. Those and her video pieces are what enables her work
to survive/ what enables a documentary or a retrospective of such
magnitude to exist. Her curator also said that they made editions of
one photograph from each of her key performances, and sold those on the
market. An important lesson for me to keep in mind, and one I think I'm
already learning for myself with this concentration on archiving and
the construction of history.
Primarily, what strikes me though, is her immense generosity. She is so generous with herself, so raw in her presentation of self. She makes people feel because she is so open in her own feeling. At one point in the documentary, the curator speaks about how, when he first met her, he thought, "Oh God, she's in love with me!" But slowly, upon getting to know her better, he realized, "No, she's not in love with me; she's in love with the world." As someone who feels a kinship to that sensibility/ propensity, I adore that description. And that love is palpable in her work. She makes herself so vulnerable and receptive, whether it's to an audience, or a partner, or to her own capacity for endurance. She pushes herself to her limits, and extends beyond them. She tests herself, and manages to exceed her own expectations. She manages this because she believes in herself deeply. She trusts herself deeply.
And she isn't arrogant when she speaks about her life or her work. She's honest and genuine and matter-of-fact, and always open in her expression. She speaks about using the pain she experiences in her performances as a vehicle that ushers her into a new level of consciousness, that it becomes almost holy, and that the power of any piece lies in the potential for the viewer to be able to harness that energy and experience it in that moment of connection, regardless of their own motivations or attitudes--in the potential to "elevate human spirit," within the performer and within the participating public. And the manifestation of that power is evident in the faces of the people sitting across from her--in their tears, in their smiles, in their hands placed empathetically over their hearts, in their nods of reverence. She clarifies something for them in this bizarre socially phenomenological moment that is at once incredibly intimate/ personal, and blatantly public. At first, it seems like the fact of the audience or the line of people waiting for their turn would diminish the intimacy of the shared gaze, but it doesn't. It actually magnifies it, and makes it visible for multiple simultaneous participants with multiple perspectives. One experiential moment shared between her and one participant is actually a multitude of simultaneous experiential moments for every observer. Everyone in that room is engaged. And that energy is the most powerful thing imaginable.
She's also just seductive as hell, and absolutely revels in it. She talks about red being a power color that energizes her, and about her allowing herself to indulge in her love of fashion once she gained more material security after her split with Ulay. She's so unbelievably enigmatic and charismatic and charming and gorgeous, but is also so firmly grounded in herself and in her own ambition and her own capability. She is poised and stoic and elegant because of the unshakable trust that she's built with herself.
I want to be that.